Recycle, Recycle, Reuse it

As we are all aware, there has been a great deal of movement away from using land-fill sites for waste disposal. That coupled with the threat of climatic changes and diminishing sources of raw materials, means we have to recycle any material we are able too.

The greatest component in the waste we all produce is plastic, which unlike traditional kitchen waste will not degrade. Playquest Adventure Play Ltd has striven to improve the structural properties of KLP© recycled plastic; this combined with its resistance to environmental forces has resulted in a material, which is an excellent replacement for timber in most circumstances including a range of play schemes.

Playquest Adventure Play

Why use recycled......?

Low maintenance, durability and cost-effectiveness are important considerations when identifying products for general landscaping projects. There are a number of recycled products which provide these benefits and more.

Specifying these products will also help to achieve sustainability or recycled content targets on landscaping projects and may even help to win tenders.

Some examples of products and applications:

BSI PAS 100 compost derived from garden waste which can be used for soil improvement, turf establishment and repair, top dressing, planting, topsoil manufacturing, or as a mulch;

recycled plastic which can be used in a variety of general landscaping applications including walkways, outdoor furniture, gates and fencing, and paving;

recycled woodchip which can be used as a surfacing material or as natural and decorative mulch;

processed sand made using 100% recycled glass which can be used as top dressing and in root zone construction;

recycled rubber which can be used within surfacing applications, within planting schemes as a mulch or a turf additive, and also (as whole tyres) on larger scale landscaping projects.

WRAP

Parks renaissance faces uncertain future

Date: 6 October 2006

In its latest report, CABE Space has warned that new ways to pay for the long term management and maintenance of parks are needed to give parks longer term security, and to sustain the improvement we have seen in parks over recent years.

Without this funding, parks run the risk of enduring a gradual decline in quality in time - requiring further large injections of capital if they are to be restored again. Local authorities need to explore new methods of paying for ongoing maintenance, and central government should encourage councils to pursue innovative funding methods.

The Paying for parks report points out that although parks have undergone a remarkable renaissance in recent years, maintaining this improvement is a major challenge. The huge areas of new and restored green space due to be created in coming years (as part of housing growth and housing market renewal schemes, or as part of the Olympic preparations) are at risk of an uncertain future unless mechanisms to generate their long term revenue funding are built into decisions being made now.

This research shows that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to funding parks. Different models will suit different circumstances and traditional local authority funding is likely to remain key for most parks. The report considers eight models in use in the UK and elsewhere to fund the management and maintenance of urban green space. It encourages local authorities and green space managers to think more imaginatively about what funding mechanisms might be available to them.